Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I disagree with the following idea that keeping my old friends is much more important than making new friends since maintaining the connection with old faces is equally vital to making new connection.
First of all, a friend play an important role in helping and supporting us while we face challenges. When we're frustrated, encouragement from these two types of friends would do us a lot of favor. For instance, when I struggled with the stressful examination in medical school, it was John, my best friend in high school, who gave me a lot of useful advices to get through the difficulty I faced. On the other hand, making new connection could be beneficial to us as well. When I started my new job few years ago, it was Jenny, a new college of mine, who taught all the basic task of the new position. Accordingly, no matter when they become friends of mine, I really appreciate to all the helps they provide.
Secondly, you would feel happy when getting alone with friends. Whether an old or new friend keeps you company, you would definitely be happier. For example, I enjoy drinking with new friends whom I met in the new classes since we could chat and find connections between us. On the other side, hanging out with folks from my home town and making fun of each other could make me relaxed and joyful as well. I enjoy the moment with old and new friends. Therefore, if a friend could make you happy, he/she is considered as true friend.
Lastly, honesty is the most important among friendship. As long as he/she does not betray or deceive you, you should definitely keep your old friend and make new friends. For instance, when I was in high school, one of my friend borrow 10,000 dollars to buy a new video game. Afterwards, he returned the money as he promised. The same situation happens years later, I lent some money to my new college for her emergency use. Few days after, she paid back to me. Both of them demonstrate what a true friend should be no matter when I knew them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Machli | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | King harald | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | wuttichai.v | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, lastly, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57222222222 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49656554213 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3236655882 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342124261449 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103867749711 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958454237533 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237006961743 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888339728205 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.