Recently, the phenomenon of good handwriting vs learning to type in school and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Whereas some people say that children should learn good writing, I sanguinely believe that In today's time, learning typing is more important. This essay will further discuss the reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reasons is that now most work is done on the computer, which makes the handwriting irrelevant. Another compelling reason is that by learning to type, students add a new skill set which will help them professionally. Therefore, the beneficial ramification of learning to type apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, sceptics say that handwriting is equally essential for students as it develops their writing skills. Although It seems ostensibly veridical, yet this is not true. As nowadays, writing skills can be developed by learning to type. According to research published by a reputed organization, students who knew typing got the first job earlier than the one with the excellent handwriting. Hence, it is believed to be the preconceived notion of the opponents.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both sides, I profoundly believe that learning to type at school is more important than the learning of handwriting. Not only by learning to type students gain excellent command over the language, but it also helps them in their professional life.
- The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization 85
- Children should learn good handwriting, or typing at school, which is more important? 77
- Student travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies? 77
- Some people think past history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion 33
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical but give more practical training throughout their courses 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to type'.
Suggestion: to type
...y believe that In todays time, learning typing is more important. This essay will furt...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, hence, if, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26294820717 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95138732327 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585657370518 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6239792771 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.615384615 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382521419674 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114418220337 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115483065351 0.071462118173 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216939674628 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972445800126 0.0609392437508 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.