The number of students who could pass university entrance exam has become less in recent times all around the world. Despite majority of people believe that instructors’ performance should be followed and graded frequently to provide better education, others argue that critizing and evaluating them will lead to some major phenomena during lessons. I would argue that although I accept that following performance is essential but classes must be teacher led to provide better education. This essay will examine both sides.
On the one hand, controlling and grading teachers will lead to countless positive impacts on education quality. When there is a strict and objective control mechanism, they will research some effective ways to increase their performance which will make students master in an effective way. Many people do their best under pressure consequently if they are provided to analyse efficiency of courses, it will become more effective in the following years. For example, as study by Government of Man in 2018 revealed that 80% of research assistant in private universities were able to get doctorate degree while this rate was only 5% in public universities where any feedbacks are not considered seriously and any interactions during courses.
On the other hand, students will not respect on both courses and teachers if they are judged without hindrance in public thus it will demotivate them leading to improper education. There is an unwritten hierarchy in classes consequently they must obey rules which are introduced by instructors. When they are motivated to declare opinions and feelings, their relationships can become worse and improper. It is obvious that under such undisciplined places, the quality of equation will become worse.
In my opinion, although I would argue that evaluation of performance is vital to improve education quality, I also strongly believe that they must respect instructors who must be leader of a group of students in order to sustain silence in lessons and force them to complete assignments to develop skills.
By way of conclusion, many governments search ways to improve education quality in high schools thus majority of individuals think that children should be persuaded to judge teachers’ performance freely to improve quality of education. However, undisciplined and unrespectful places will not result in success.
- Some people think that there is a great influence of news media on people’s lives and this is a negative development. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and relevant examples. 78
- You work for an international company. You have seen an advertisement for a training course which will be useful for your job.Write a letter to your manager. In your letter:Describe the training course you want to doExplain what the company could do to he 89
- You recently bought some food at the supermarket, but, when you go home , you found that the food was in bad condition. Write a letter to the manager of the supermarket. In your letter,explain what happened to you , give details of the day and time of pur 73
- Advantages and disadvantages of mobile phones in our daily lives 11
- Some people believe that unpaid community service be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ormance which will make students master in an effective way. Many people do their best under pressu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tful places will not result in success.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, of course, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2037.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47580645161 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94699557565 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567204301075 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.0626642242 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.8 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227945370997 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723670744305 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529034583981 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130847245832 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457574284645 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.