The diagram illustrates how trampling affects the environment in the non-urban area. Overall, there are nine stages in the process with two cases, they all begin with flattening grass by human's feet and end with the deterioration of the soil's quality.
Everything starts when tourists are walking in the countryside area. There are two possible scenarios, both of them lead to the same sorrowful end. First of all, vegetation is easily damaging and, following this, the plant's stems and leaves become much weaker. At the same time, trampling makes soil significantly harder, because the amount of the air in the soil decreases, so plants stop naturally develop and normally reproduce. Due to it the erosion swiftly grows, vegetation sharply reduces, that aggravates the quality of the soil.
In the subsequent stage, there is erosion and decreased quality of the soil, which leads to vegetation death and irreparably spoils the environment.
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling ,a gap year,before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons.For others this is an expensive waste of time .Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- the flow chart shows trampling, the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment. 11
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Writing task 2 (an essay)Internet contains a lot of information, however, sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- how should we ensure that television is a positive influence in the life of children 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31333333333 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75784940367 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6627717382 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0543126827337 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317133547928 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687501102666 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0342611861447 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024934663532 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.