Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people often hold a belief that a handsome salary does matter to employees much more than the feeling of fulfillment at work. I personally disagree with this argument due to the crucial roles of job contentment in the well-being and prosperity of both organizations and workers.
To begin with, a satisfactory job helps maintain people’s work-life balance, therefore, they can live their lives to the fullest. If people find enjoyment when working, they can also improve their personal and family welfare. By contrast, working under pressure would result in deterioration in mental and physical health conditions in the long run, which no payment can compensate. A prime example would be a heartrending story of Naoya, a 27-year-old engineer, who died after two years working at a large Japanese telecom firm due to stress at work. Thus, it is more beneficial to opt for an occupation that makes us satisfied/gives us joy than to consider only a hefty pay scale.
In additione, employee satisfaction eventually generates higher profits for the corporations. When staff is contented with what they are doing, they will be definitely enthusiastic to devote a greater deal of effort into their job. As a result, their productivity and efficiency will be significantly enhanced, which secures the stable growth of the business. Meanwhile, despite receiving a fat paycheck, a large number of workers still give up their positions because of their discontentment for many reasons such as aggressive and autocratic managers. Consequently, the rate of employee retention can be lowered, which negatively affects the companies’ wealthy or even survival.
All things considered, I strongly opine that it is work fulfilment, lucrative income, greatly promote the profitability and development of both individuals and companies. Hence, the corporations are recommended to adjust the policies to facilitate staff’s work environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | msolanki | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from 57
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016 84
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to get news. However, others believe that they can get news better through other media.Discuss both views and give your opinion? 78
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 406, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...hile, despite receiving a fat paycheck, a large number of workers still give up their positions b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54849498328 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26561527576 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675585284281 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5333749238 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.081962670988 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270493070906 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046337544823 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601120693478 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732724900291 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.