The diagram shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its life cycle.
The flow diagram illustrates the environment problems increased with the use of different product life cycle from its making to use it.
we can see here the first step to make a product is started with the planning and design stage to decide first how the product looks and how to make it. In the next stage, which materials and energy sources use it should be decided, then with the usage of decided materials and sources, we can produce product in the production process. After the final product produced then it goes to the packaging part of the industries to pack the product carefully to transport product without damage to the distributor's places. From the different shops, it is sold to the customers where it is used up to its life span. At the end of the product life, some of the parts of that product are used through recycling it as another product raw materials and other remaining part of that are disposed. Further, this process of making product repeats by taking feedback from customers to make another product and it never stops.
Overall, it can be seen that all the products are made with the use of this flow steps and introduce new and new product in the market. More and more parts which are not recycled are increased and due to that it affects the environment
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | Bholo | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | Zh.Dinara | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-23 | Littlebinbin | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-30 | Gursahibjeet Singh | 79 | view |
| 2019-01-29 | dixit banugariya | 78 | view |
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are importance in achieving happiness? 61
- The diagram shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its life cycle. 67
- The bar chart shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity of 2014. 78
- The pie chart shows the main reasons what agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three region of the world during the 1990s. 73
- The table shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... cycle from its making to use it. we can see here the first step to make a p...
^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...duce product in the production process. After the final product produced then it goes...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 642, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e span. At the end of the product life, some of the parts of that product are used through ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...new product in the market. More and more parts which are not recycled are increa...
^^
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d more parts which are not recycled are increased and due to that it affects the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65502183406 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4016355671 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493449781659 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4599490632 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.444444444 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209186839297 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998179550779 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551183930763 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153179155207 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668553471323 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.