The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
the first graph illustrates portions of students, who study for different reasons, in many age's intervals, while the second graph gives relatively how much the employers are supporting their employees depending on their
ages.
overall, most students with below 26 years old are studying to get a job (80%), while 10% of them just study because it matches their interest. In contrast, 70% and below 20% of students, whom over 49 years are just studying for the sake of interest and for career respectively. For the second graph, one can see that most employers (more than 60%) are tending to support students who are under 26, while the least years supporting is for students with 30-39 years old.
Getting career was the main aim of students who are under 26 years, decreasing significantly with increasing of student's age, while it is oppositely for students who study because of their interest, their percents were climbed as well the age in increasing, to reach the same percent of interest and career as an aim of study for 40-49 years old students (40% for each reason).
we can see that the support from the employers towards their employees on both time off and help with fees decrease as the age of students increase to hit at bottom of more than 30% to 30-39 years old students, then it rose slightly to more than 40% for over 49 years old students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | noor salah | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | Simranjot | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-17 | Minh Pham | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-08 | PS4pro | 73 | view |
| 2017-07-27 | Anh_nguyen | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 87
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010. 67
- The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010. 67
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries. (REWRITE) 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the first graph illustrates portions of stu...
^^^
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rting their employees depending on their ages. overall, most students wit...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ages
...g their employees depending on their ages. overall, most students with be...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...ees depending on their ages. overall, most students with below 26 years old ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...d students 40% for each reason. we can see that the support from the emplo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82278481013 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46162666389 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514767932489 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.0133917896 43.030603864 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.5 112.824112599 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.5 22.9334400587 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177898591836 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101625153195 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321649566358 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115960274741 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392600638241 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.0 13.2329268293 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.