Some universities require students to take classes in many subjects. Other universities require students to specialize in one subject. Which is better?
University plays a major role in shaping the student’s career. Thus, to enhance student’s experience of knowledge, some universities require students to take classes in many subjects; however, other colleges do not. Considering the benefits, I believe the universities should require the students to specialise in only one subject for the following reasons.
First of all, allowing the students to learn and master one subject will give them enough time to study for their major meticulously. As a result, this will help them hone their skills and knowledge of their speciality. Years ago, a survey conducted in the state university of Maharashtra in india demonstrates a good example for this. As the university’s results and admissions,were going down consecutively for a decade, a survey was conducted in which the students were asked about the cause of their relatively poor performance in the exams. In response, most of the student pointed out the policy of the university which made them to take multiple courses. Consequently, they were not able to focus on their majors and thus, couldn’t give their best in the tests. However, seeing the results of this survey, the university altered its regulations. Subsequently, there was an upsurge in the student’s performance seen during their evaluation. As you can see, how just focusing on one subject can enhance the student’s performance.
Moreover, specialising in one subject saves money which is required otherwise while taking multiple subjects in the college. For instance, in university, I was allowed to specialise in Geriatric physical therapy only. On the other hand, when my sister was in university, it was compulsory for her to take 2 extra courses other than her major, for which she had to pay for the tuition and the exams for those courses. This added an extra financial load on my family, as we were paying extra for the subjects other than her major, in which she was not even interested. This shows how taking extra subjects in the university could not be economical for the student and the family.
In conclusion, I support the idea that the universities should not require the students to take many courses. This will not only limit the ability of a student to perform effectively in their majors, but also increase the unreasonable cost of education. Thus the universities should consider students specialising only in one subject.
- People learn in different ways Some people learn by doing things other people learn by reading about things others learn by listening to people talk about things Which of these methods of learning is best for you Use specific examples to support your choi 78
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. First, atmospheric 73
- Some universities require students to take classes in many subjects. Other universities require students to specialize in one subject. Which is better? 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Watching television is bad for children. Use specific details and examples to support your answer. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising can tell you a lot about a country. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , were
...university's results and admissions,were going down consecutively for a decade, ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 255, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ase the unreasonable cost of education. Thus the universities should consider studen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25190839695 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09087102193 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498727735369 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2016128683 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.2 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.65 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421634860345 0.236089414692 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150807184695 0.076458572812 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127515303462 0.0737576698707 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319226275625 0.150856017488 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142473885189 0.0645574589148 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.