Some people believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have high level degree. Do you agree or disagree?
To some individuals with growing standard of life, manual labors’ doing the most exhausting work seems to be underpaid compared to highly-qualified professionals. However, I would beg to differ claiming that it is highly-skilled employees’ performing the intelligence demanding tasks and robotization implementation in industry that keeps salaries of physical workers poorly-paid.
In no way common labor’s role in assisting industry development to be underestimated. It is no secret that qualifications issued by worldwide known educational organizations are no match to experience gained in semi-skilled work, such as CNC machining, assembling etc., performed in production field. To some of unskilled labor what moves them to foreman position, which is highest-paying occupation for unqualified personnel, is their inimitable knowledge and experience gained through years of routine work. A striking example is the Azerbaijani industry who try to keep these talents by any means necessary, therefore improving their salary package.
Notwithstanding such considerations based on various factors, jobs that generally acquire professional qualifications hold strong. Firstly, it is well-known fact that brainy jobs are the highest well-paid jobs therefore fulfilled usually by the highly-qualified personnel. The reason why manual labor cannot hit these opportunities is that they are totally unqualified for such positions. Secondly, with development of modern technology automation and mechatronics, robots do not let the value of labor work to go up. Evidence for in support of this position, can be found in the fact that in long term purchasing automated line for serial production is much more cost-effective than hiring unskilled personnel for same task with as much income as of skilled-workers.
In conclusion, although manual labor’s matchless experience gained by performing ordinary work for long period seems of higher value, highly-skilled staff doing brainy job making them extremely valuable than common labor and automated systems implementation inexpensiveness retarding the pay increase for unskilled labor will never let them to obtain competitive salaries as of highly-skilled workers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | shalomis101@gmail.com | 22 | view |
- Many people today use their phones for sending texts more than talking. What are the reasons for this? Are there more advantages than disadvantages? 89
- Nowadays parents are sending their children on trips abroad for educational purposes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 61
- Some people believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have high level degree Do you agree or disagree 90
- Some people think that big international sporting events are not worthwhile for the host country.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people believe that international sporting events are the ideal opportunity to show the world the qualities of the hosting nation. Others believe that these events are mainly a large unjustifiable expense. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put before the verb 'fulfilled'.
Suggestion: usually fulfilled
...re the highest well-paid jobs therefore fulfilled usually by the highly-qualified personnel. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05974842767 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.61251642349 2.80592935109 129% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619496855346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.6387707458 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.583333333 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124530137275 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480574563777 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430178874812 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846428628388 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387413571874 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.