Government and big companies should work together to reverse environmental damage, rather than expecting individuals to take responsibility. To what extent do you agree or disagree. Share your opinion and examples.
Environment plays a vital role in everyone's life and issues related to environment has always been a hot potato topic. Collaboration of government and industries can create some remarkable changes while individuals' contribution is comparatively low. However, they can also put their hands in and my inclination does fall with this view.
There are several ways to protect the damage cause to environment by a partnership. Government possess the authority to establish law and decide punishments. Hence, initiatives can be implemented to save the planet and spread awareness. For example, green Delhi, clean Delhi is a good initiative of Delhi government followed by other stated as well leads to safer environment. Similarly, big companies can also contribute by featuring a social worker in advertisement of a product. Advertising can bring cognizance about scare resources and harms causing by use of non renewable resource. For instance, a company can advertise about the implications to burn fossil fuel as it emits hazardous contents in the environment which considered the principal reason of global warming.
In addition, it is certainly true that an individual can not bring a significant change. However, following instructions and laws given by government and industries in their advertisements can save the environment to some extent. Also, a person can join an NGO to enhance their mental horizon and thinking abilities to create a difference between what is right and wrong for the environment. In other words, self-control, education and awareness can make a remarkable changes in the environment.
In conclusion, it is indeed true that big authorities and companies can bring a massive contribution to save the earth and, an individual can give for the betterment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-03 | khushbu1994 | 78 | view |
- Culture and traditions change from generation to generation. Why does this happen? What can be done to change it? 61
- Some parents believe that reading books for entertainment is a waste of children's time. They think that children should read only serious educational books. What is your opinion? 78
- Advertising is influencing people more and more. Is this a positive or a negative trend? Give your own opinion and examples. 93
- Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Many sports players advertise sports-related products. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'possesses'.
Suggestion: possesses
...nvironment by a partnership. Government possess the authority to establish law and deci...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'possesses'.
Suggestion: possesses
...nvironment by a partnership. Government possess the authority to establish law and deci...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to create a difference between what is right and wrong for the environment. In ...
^^
Line 9, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ong for the environment. In other words, self-control, education and awareness ca...
^^
Line 9, column 471, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'change'?
Suggestion: change
...ion and awareness can make a remarkable changes in the environment. In conclusion,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, similarly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45683453237 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25546722764 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597122302158 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0368427835 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.133333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.087231348168 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031624001569 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253970706273 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0595267384956 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177567119808 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.