Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.
Rather than seniority, employees work performance needs to be the deciding factor in an employees monetary compensation.
Experience does not always mean more proficient-- Many occupations base an employee’s salary and movement within the job ranks on the seniority, or how long that employee has been part of the company. Though this might seem like a good idea on the surface, many employees with longevity do not always perform at the higher levels of the new hungry and proficiently educated employees. What I feel determines this is the work ethic of each individual. A graduate of public relations from Harvard who is hired by a public relations firm might perform significantly stronger at work than an employee (who only graduated from high school) with seniority. Furthermore, these archaic employees might not understand the new implementations that our newer society demands for success in the workplace.
Work ethic is essential for optimum results---For companies to maximize profits and excel financially, the most qualified employees need to be viable. If an esthetician working at a spa is the most talked about and is the best representation of the positive aspects of that spa, why should someone who has been there longer receive more commission based hours? These employees with "seniority" might have the experience, but how can that justify a better facial or better outcome. It is the presumptuous nature of some of these older individuals in expecting more that throws off the productivity levels. Moreover, an employee with seniority isn’t forced to try as hard at their occupation due to the fact that they continue to receive the highest compensation and potentially the most hours. How does this justify the quality of work that these employees output? It doesn’t. Consequently, these highly qualified new employees are pushed to the backburner, while these "senior" employees reap the benefits.
In opposition to this argument, one can see that highly experienced employees can be beneficial to a company due to there experience within the company walls. However, this experience needs to be additionally commensurate with a strong work ethic.
Therefore, work performance should be the sole basis upon whether an employee deserves higher financial compensation. This will result in higher productivity and the highest possible levels of employee functioning within the workplace.
- Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity. 80
- "To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space inadequate. 69
- Nature's Way, a chain of stores selling health food and other health-related products, is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville. The store should prove to be very successful: Nature's Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas wher 70
Comments
flaws: Sentence-Sentence
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.047 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 381 350
No. of Characters: 1984 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.418 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.207 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.906 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 149 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 112 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 85 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 66 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.412 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.769 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.471 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.328 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.543 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.047 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
The E-rater gave you 4.0,
The E-rater gave you 4.0, while we gave it 5.0. So it becomes 4.5.
You may read this
You may read this link:
http://www.testbig.com/question/questions-about-essay-e-rater
We believe you real mark will
We believe you real mark will be around 5.5 for tomorrow. Please be back and let us know.
Can someone please comment :)