Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity.
The discussion of the issue among companies and in the society as a whole has come into vogue during the last decade. In my point of view, i agree with the speaker for some obvious reasons.
First, it goes without saying that performance and merit conducts the job, not seniority. In order to see this point clearly, let us see an example. For example, think of a worker who has been working for a company and 60 years old. Do you think he could do the same job at the same rate as a young worker does? Of course not. it is true for mental works and labor works as well. A young computer engineer and also a worker could perform highly than an older engineer or worker. So, to promote seniority against performance and merit is not well reasoned thinking .
The further reason why i have such a view is that inequality between performance and wage may discourage employees who has merit and high performance.If a company promotes senior people , young employees will think that there is no need to work hard to get promoted because he or she will not be promoted for the reason that they are not seniors and their hard working will be neglected.
However, that is not to say that seniority is not important. Seniority means experience an employee gained during his whole life. Of course it is gonna bear some importance. For instance, think of a group of scientists working on a subject to invent an gadget. It is highly possible that senior ones will be more productive due to their experience but we cannot neglect the possibility of new employee`s coming with a marvelous idea leading to inventing that gadget.
From what has been discussed above we may safely draw that seniority should not be the basis of employee compensation, they should be promoted according to their performance and mer'it/
- source of innovation,whether it depends on individuals or a group 60
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today 75
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 74
- Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity. 75
- Analysis of ArgumentThe following advice was given to a politician by his political consultant: It is true that 200 apartment renters protested in the rain about the elimination of rent control regulation. However, there are 20,000 renters in the entire c 95
Sentence: Of course it is gonna bear some importance.
Description: A verb, present participle or gerund is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to gonna and bear
Sentence: For instance, think of a group of scientists working on a subject to invent an gadget.
Description: The fragment , think of is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace think with verb, past participle
Sentence: Of course it is gonna bear some importance.
Error: gonna Suggestion: ?
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 175 200
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 320 350
No. of Characters: 1447 1500
No. of Different Words: 175 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.229 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.522 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.465 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 95 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 68 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 44 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.374 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.294 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.535 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.092 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5