one should only consider the positive points and ignore the negative ones
As the author’s claim that only considering positive points of an individual is an unsound thing as only considering positive things may lead’s to ignoring the weakness and history teaches us that ignoring the weaknesses lead certain individual into detrimental or fatal situation.
Taking an example of a cricketer who has a fear of bouncer delivered ball, just by ignoring his/her weakness does not accomplice him or her as a complete cricketer as taking a preventative step on weakness help an individual achieve something extraordinary in life.
Weaknesses are not confined to an individual but also for an organization where the loopholes are recognized and preventive steps are taken, examples of a company where the sales are declining, thus, recognizing the lacuna and weakness regarding the marketing strategies, operational strategies, can help an organization to increase its merit in terms of sales and productivity.
For some instance author claim about ignoring the weaknesses seems valid. One must take a decision by considering the overall scenario of circumstance, for example, students preparing for an exam having a variety of subject, ignoring the subject which he or she is weak is a wise choice as ignoring it saves more time to horn the subject which have more weightage and focusing more on subjects which are considered as strength, definately help to get good grades.
To sum up, weakness is a part of individual, were nobody is granted any mercy, every individual has a certain kind of loopholes or lacuna, with which he can carry forward or can work on it, to an author’s claim that one must only consider the positive point of a person and ignore the negative ones, seem unwarranted as only considering the positive point seriously dampen the overall growth of an individual and impede him or her to overcomes his or her weaknesses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | Mateo Chen | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | jimHsu | 70 | view |
| 2021-11-04 | Tabellini22 | 83 | view |
| 2021-08-27 | wootwoot | 66 | view |
| 2021-06-04 | nikhils | 70 | view |
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fish -ing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing throughthe city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park departmentdevotes litt 23
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of thesocieties and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibilityof corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as m 50
- one should only consider the positive points and ignore the negative ones 50
- one should only consider the positive points and ignore the negative ones 50
- "Since its opening in Collegeville twenty years ago, Monarch Books has developed a large customer base due to its reader-friendly atmosphere and wide selection of books on all subjects. Last month, Book and Bean, a combination bookstore and coffee sh 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 474, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her to overcomes his or her weaknesses.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, so, thus, for example, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06162803842 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537704918033 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 50.0 23.0359550562 217% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 126.050805454 60.3974514979 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 264.333333333 118.986275619 222% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 50.8333333333 23.4991977007 216% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.21951772744 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247089364685 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123294720946 0.0831039109588 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112628677868 0.0758088955206 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139057224179 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118017373446 0.0667264976115 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.5 14.1392134831 202% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 12.27 48.8420337079 25% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.92365168539 184% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.0 12.1743820225 197% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.77 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.8971910112 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 22.0 11.2143820225 196% => OK
text_standard: 29.0 11.7820224719 246% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.