Many employers are employing people with good skills as well as good qualifications. Do you agree or disgree that good social skills are as important as good qualifications to succed in job?
Nowadays, it has increasingly become popular that companies are preferring to recruit candidates who have university degrees and soft skills as well. In my opinion, I believe that both these traits are essential for a person to achieve a remarkable position at the workplace.
To embark upon, an employee having academic knowledge about the subject with some useful tactics to disseminate this information to the targeted group of consumers would be beneficial for an organization to attain success in the market. Taking an example of an agrologist who is being employed in the agriculture sector will achieve success in his/her job only if he/she has basic education qualification in agriculture stream, and also has the experience of sensible talking behaviour with farmers who hardly know about technical terminology and procedures. Due to the possession of these qualities, one could be able to convince the customers logically and conveniently to purchase the product or services offered by the concerned department.
However, if one out of these two characteristics is missing in recruits, then factory authorities have to invest a lot of time and money on them in order to uplift their standards and maturity levels. Only then, they would be able to provide those kinds of services which a company intends. Sometimes, this approach comes out to be risky in those cases when trainees after upgrading their skills leave the parent organization and start working at some other place which is providing some extra emoluments than the previous one. Therefore, it may prove detrimental and time-consuming process for industry.
In conclusion, it is always beneficial for an employer to hire only those freshers who have secondary or tertiary education creditionals with social skills in order to attain maximum profits and output for an organization. I consider it as a positive trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-06 | ishpinder45 | 11 | view |
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?Give reasons for your an 78
- Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- Nowadays people make new friends through social networks and internet chat groups Some people think this is good Others think that face to face interaction is essential Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 73
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...reasingly become popular that companies are preferring to recruit candidates who have universi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01356931229 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623333333333 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.7353599553 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.636363636 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0774312279055 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0251737083779 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340727424198 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0520656408043 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271256221471 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.