Traffic congestion is a big problem. Some people argue that solution is building wider roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Undoubtedly, overcrowding of vehicles on roads are major concerning area for regimes, regions and natives which leads to vast amount of complications. However, a majority of humans deems that establishment of wider roads is beneficial measure to tackle this hurdle. Whilst,I strongly agree with this perception as these roads are helpful to diverting the traffic, saving times, reducing the accident cases as well.
The main reasons to support this prospective is that if authorities would be constructed wider roads than these roads divert the huge number of vehicles on another roads. Moreover, a vast majority of people will be selecting second roads to reach their destinations which assist governments to drastic decrease of traffic upon roads. In addition to this, wider roads not only declines the traffic jam but also useful to consume people’s time because masses expand quality of time in traffic jams which perilous for them and fail the to arrive their necessary workplaces. For example, in Delhi, if anyone wants to reach Delhi airport than they athletes waits for 2-3 hours in traffic congestion to arrive there.
The another factor to take side of this notion is that wider roads are crucial for saving human’s life because these roads decrease dramatically numbers of vehicles on roads which causes of serious accidents. Even though, if masses would never be neglect those roads which are full with hustle bustle of transports and give priority another roads than they save their lives from the accidents. Similarly, nowadays a majority of people are being in hurry which leads to detrimental accidents so these roads are better for them. For instance, Malkit Singh from Patiala, he had lost his life in a serious accident on 17 October 2017 due to his hurry in lots of traffic.
In conclusion, although traffic congestion is a serious obstacle in the whole world but installation of wider roads are essential solutions to fell the amount of transport on roads.
- The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emission in different countries during three different years.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below shows the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English,in 2000 and 2010.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- The table below shows the proportion of pupils attending four types of secondary schools between 2000 and 2009.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some companies use major sports events for promoting their products. Some people believe that it has negative effects on sports. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The charts below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...al measure to tackle this hurdle. Whilst,I strongly agree with this perception as ...
^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. Even though, if masses would never be neglect those roads which are full with ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20123839009 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67667426307 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547987616099 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.5482754032 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117037949038 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053639928838 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460659536947 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966229196289 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057473931858 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.