Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take?
The importance of giving on time assessments, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of reducing marks by universities has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on students’ results who present lately tasks in recent years. it can be agreed that late submission has negative impacts students’ performance, but some people claim that it has some solutions as well. this essay will elaborate how delays are the result of lack of understanding and how universities could solve this after leading to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why students present projects after due days, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that the assignments given by the faculties may not be understandable to all students. For instance, maths and physics lectures result complex subjects and sometimes students spend a lot of time to understand them. lack of understanding of some lectures, therefore, can play a vital role for students to complete satisfactorily their assignments on time.
Approaches to deal with problems of deducing marks from students’ tasks are numerous, but the most effective one is that lecturers should sit with pupils and know the concerns of the subject that they are facing, which is not impracticable and unattainable but comprehensible and feasible. As an illustration, some universities organise tutorial sessions in which students and lectures discuss doubts in order to solve students’ misunderstandings. tutorials, hence, can play a vital role to reduce concerns of students and motivate them to present their projects before due day.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of deducing points for late presentations is prominent, although it has some solutions that should be well handled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | jsrc | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | hemsingh81 | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | Cheyi1127 | 77 | view |
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss. 85
- in town and cities large malls should replace to the local shops. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- writing examination 55
- In some countries around the world voting is compulsory Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting 77
- mandatory voting 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...o present lately tasks in recent years. it can be agreed that late submission has ...
^^
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...aim that it has some solutions as well. this essay will elaborate how delays are the...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fter leading to a logical conclusion. At the outset, there are numerous reason...
^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lack
...pend a lot of time to understand them. lack of understanding of some lectures, ther...
^^^^
Line 9, column 459, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Tutorials
...solve students' misunderstandings. tutorials, hence, can play a vital role to reduce...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, may, so, therefore, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49828178694 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25627804058 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570446735395 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7902834464 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.454545455 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188854011368 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696971102343 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040499533868 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11372261752 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193084838742 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.