Smacking children is the best way to discipline children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe in the age-old practice of spanking juveniles to teach them. Personally, I disagree with the idea of instructing young ones through penalizing, because I believe that implementing others ways of controlling them will serve for the common interest.
Inflicting pain to the children is not the best way to in grain rules and manners. The little ones, out of curiosity, which is their natural instinct, could be a troublemaker. Beating them, in reality puts an end to their curiosity. this, in turn, has several repercussions on brain development as the child might live in the fear of one's parents. Further, such kids might conceive their parents as evil, become stubborn and sometimes isolate themselves from their family. For example , there have been reported cases where teenagers commit suicide out of the fear of the punishment they might receive from their guardians.
Nevertheless, I believe that alternative discipline strategies such as creating consequences for both good and unruly behaviours. this can only be evolved by spending time with the kids by understanding their physiology. For instance, taking away the favourite bedtime snack or toy as a result of unfinished dinner could be one method to show direct outcomes of misconduct. Praising etiquettes of a toddler by rewarding with gift or complement is another way. Overall, linking an after-effect directly to the conduct can induce a response that choices have direct consequences.
In conclusion, I believe that it is entirely preposterous to hit a minor to regulate him or her. Instead, inventing non lethal ways to tackle a youngster is a better way to discipline.
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Smacking children is the best form of discipline? To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping center or mall to do their shopping.Is this a positive or a negative development? 73
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...reality puts an end to their curiosity. this, in turn, has several repercussions on ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... as the child might live in the fear of ones parents. Further, such kids might conce...
^^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hemselves from their family. For example , there have been reported cases where te...
^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...es for both good and unruly behaviours. this can only be evolved by spending time wi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26315789474 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01710442377 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665413533835 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0951490235 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0908914166837 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316443456537 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617664264823 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504313439179 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122964877557 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.