Excessive traffic has made cities unpleasant places to live and work in. For this reason, private cars should be completely banned from city centres. To what extent do you agree or disagee?
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">As heavy traffic in the cities make its landscapes ugly, making it difficult to live and work in. So, private vehicles </span>should be<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> completely cordoned off from the central parts of the cities. I completely agree with this idea of banning certain vehicles for several reasons.
There are several reasons </span>as to<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> why personal transport is the part and parcel of the huge problem of traffic congestion in cities. F</span>irstly<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">, with more people tending to own multiple vehicles for the sake of their own comfort, peak traffic conditions are bound to happen. At the same time, cities are failing to accommodate the vehicular influx, due to lack of infrastructure. Secondly, reckless car owners park their vehicles in areas demarcated for other public uses or meet accidents, creating a nuisance and difficulties for </span>public<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">. For these reasons, cities have a dirty outlook and its citizens bear the misery.
In my opinion, prohibiting only the personal cars in city centres would definitely be a good idea to control traffic. F</span>irstly<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">, prohibition of such automobiles, would not only force the people to opt for public transportation services, but also ease the traffic conditions of </span>the whole<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> city in general. Secondly, office goers would be able to reach their destinations in timely manner, even in the peak hours of dawn and dusk, making their lives simpler. Further, people would not have to face, the damaging noxious pollutants from heavy vehicular activity, thus improving the air quality. Therefore, banning private </span>motorcars<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> from city centres will be a relief for everyone.
In conclusion, I believe that as traffic makes lives of the people miserable, banning personal cars in city’s main areas is a valid thing to do.</span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | Jayant Chohda | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Jayant Chohda | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-22 | rimjhim | 56 | view |
| 2017-01-29 | hs2mann | 61 | view |
- The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 73
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 73
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 61
- A rise in the living standard of the country seems to only benefit the cities rather than rural areas. What problems might this difference cause? How might the problems be reduced? 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, in conclusion, in general, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.25252525253 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.44352607592 2.80592935109 158% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589225589226 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8975147846 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.642857143 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177464400733 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900184749717 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527355080461 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150234348981 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445968013261 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.97 12.4159519038 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.