Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
There are many characteristics a good leader should possess for the team to succeed. However, it is very rare for a leader to have all of these characteristics, and therefore some traits can be seen as more crucial than others. A leader can make the best decisions for the survival and prosperity of his team, but without the respect of his peers, a leader might as well step down from his position.
Trust is key for a leader to successfully lead his team and respect plays a major role in gaining the trust of your team. Without trust, the team will not complete or execute their leader’s decision to the fullest extent and may challenge or even rebel against the action. For example, a stockbroker who does not trust and respect the decision of his manager may not execute the buy order that was given by his manager. This will undoubtedly cause chaos in the team as team members may not have the foresight to see the big picture that the leader has seen and bases his decisions. Even though a mistake can be fixed, the dynamic of a leader-follower relationship would be damaged from the lack of respect, which is fundamental to the structure of the team.
A team that respects their leader will also be loyal to their leader. For a team to function at the most critical times, a team member should be ready to follow the directive of their leader at any cost. During the live-fire testing during the development of the military transport unit, Bradley Fighting Vehicle, the commanding officer ordered his troops to conduct the tests fairly and just even though it may cost them their positions. Fair testing saved countless lives on the battlefield. These results would not have been as successful if the team had not been loyal to their commanding officer and did not respect him.
A good leader should be able to make sound moral judgments to ensure the team can thrive no matter the conditions. Good judgments can make or break a team, and overall essential for a team to survive and the morality of a team’s actions can have a significant impact on the team’s output. However, a leader does not necessarily need to make the decisions by himself. Many CEOs and private equity investors can lead their company and assign critical decisions to the hired experts in their respective fields.
In conclusion, a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers is crucial and irreplaceable to the team and a more important characteristic than the ability to make sound moral judgments, which can be delegated to the team.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs. 83
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 77
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems. 58
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80630630631 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73459690813 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470720720721 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9364101806 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.555555556 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244425162418 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936019317419 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826376411571 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181062391542 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969820004597 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.