Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In regard to whether all university students should be forced to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Some argue that history is a fundamental subject that everyone needs to obtain, others think that it is totally unnecessary and a waste of time. Yet, my personal experience and real-life observation have lead me to conclude with the latter. My arguments for this point is listed as follows.
To start with, requiring students to take courses out of their major can add additional pressure on them. As every student's condition varies individually to individually, some students already have redundant projects, researches, and extra-curricular activities that are still in progress or already scheduled. To force them to take extra classes will only add more burden on one. Take students that are pursuing a career as an athlete for example. It is unlikely that an athlete would benefit on taking history lecturers and, instead, it is squandering their precious time on training. As a result, for certain students, taking history courses might even cause negative effects.
In addition, for students that study in majors highly connected to history and students that have a strong interest in history should take the history course, since it can provide one to have a more comprehensive picture of the past. For instance, majors such as philosophy and art history are both connected with history. Students in these departments should be required to take history course to provide them with a firm foundation. The knowledge of history could act as a formula impulsing them to go further and dig deeper in the field. As a result, schools need to determine which majors should be required and which of those should not.
In conclusion, taking into account these reasons, whereas history courses can broaden one's horizons, schools should highly recommend students to take it, not by requiring them, only if their major is highly linked to the field of history.
- A high school requires their students (aged 16-17) to choose an activity to attend in the summer holiday between 11th and 12th. Which of the following do you think is more beneficial?-taking part in the university-level course (for example, the course rel 90
- Do you agree or disagree: the universities should spend more money in improving facilities (libraries, computer labs) than hiring famous teachers. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: it’s better to make friends with intelligent people than with people who have a good sense of humor? 80
- Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline 85
- art industry; kids that have extraordinary athletic abilities can be sent to sport academy and receive professional training from coaches. From the above examples, it can prevent students from going in a wrong direction and provide them a platform to buil 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 87, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ns, whereas history courses can broaden ones horizons, schools should highly recomme...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in regard to, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14461538462 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71883023924 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9428325057 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3199216765 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112878025628 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117303617965 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20803859213 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435699058175 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.