A nation should require all of its student to study the same curriculum until they enter college.
In contemporary society, it is a general tendency that education plays an important role in people's daily life. Contrary to the statement, I believe that the majority of the students should take identical courses, but those who have strong preferences or flairs should be able to take curriculums in special institution. My arguments are listed as follow.
It is inevitable that if the courses throughout the nation are all the same, students can just go to community school's that are adjacent to their region. Moreover, the nation would not have to employ teachers and professors in special fields of study. As a result, the education system would be relatively more simple and could save a colossal of money especially for families that struggle with a tight budget. For instance, most students nowadays would have to lend money from the bank and sacrifice their times with their beloved family just to pursue to a better university. But with identical courses, the issue could be tempered.
In addition, it would also be easier to control the teaching qualities of every teacher if the nation holds the same content. For this reason, the education center would be able to train the faculties with the same material and if any teachers throughout the nation want to retire or quit the job for any reason, it would be easy to replace them without having the novice teacher to adjust for a long time. Unlike convention eras, each time when substitution teacher are needed, students to compromise to an unfamiliar new educational material and might actually affect their learning qualities.
Admittedly, everything has two sides and every student's condition is different from each other. Students that have a strong inclination or talent should be encouraged to take lessons that can elevate their specific skills. Take a student that holds artistic talents, he or she should not waste time in a regular school teaching general subjects since it could not help the students in reaching their goal. They should be, what, however, be attending courses that train their aesthetic views and drawing techniques. On the hand, if the student is pursuing to be an athlete, they should have the same opportunities to forfeit general courses and spend more time focusing on training.
All in all, by taking into account these factors, the school can benefit the most by implementing the same curriculum to the nation, but also establish a few specialized schools for talented students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Meet Tank | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
- Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline 85
- You have long been friend with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her? 70
- Do you agree or disagree: the universities should spend more money in improving facilities (libraries, computer labs) than hiring famous teachers. 90
- art industry; kids that have extraordinary athletic abilities can be sent to sport academy and receive professional training from coaches. From the above examples, it can prevent students from going in a wrong direction and provide them a platform to buil 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: it’s better to make friends with intelligent people than with people who have a good sense of humor? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...al institution. My arguments are listed as follow. It is inevitable that if the cour...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, all the same, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11519607843 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66315796959 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524509803922 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3618944744 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.764705882 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19184376848 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065797209318 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551800218202 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115879140437 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386640287628 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.