TPO 42
In this set of materials, the reading passage states that some architectures use glass for the design of a building, but glass is harmful to wild birds because they cannot distinguish a glass and crash with it, so the reading provides 3 solutions for this problem. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading points by providing different reasons (and examples).
First, the reading indicates that using one-way classes instead of regular glass can solve the problem because people can see out but birds cannot see inside and they prevent to fly through it, and they think that it is a solid barrier. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that the one-way class reflect the pictures as a mirror. It reflects a picture of sky or trees, so, like regular glass, birds cannot distinguish this is a mirror, and they try to fly through it.
Second, the reading argues that people would use colorful lines or paint on the regular glass. In this situation, birds see the strips and they prevent to fly through the glass; conversely, what the professor believes is different. He points out that by colorful lines people can see out and the light comes into the building, but birds see these lines as a-holes, and they try to fly through it. Also, for preventing this happen, unpainted glasses become extremely small, and it prevents the light from going to the building, and the building becomes dark. So it is not practical solutions.
Finally, according to the reading, birds can use a magnetic field for finding their ways, so people can use a magnetic compass for building; hence, birds can find their ways by this. However, the lecturer believes that birds only use the magnetic field for finding ways in long distance. For example, when they want to migrate from a cold country to a warmer country, they use a magnetic field for finding ways. But for short distance, they use their eyes or brightness of a light. So, this solution cannot work in the cities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Pariakarimi | 80 | view |
- TPO 42 73
- Do you agree or disagree? in order to be well-information, a person must get information from many different resource. 70
- TPO 12 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours. 73
- TPO 21 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, for example, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 346.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89306358382 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40862273167 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476878612717 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.51434878587 528% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5268685661 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.866666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509044185008 0.272083759551 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172734250405 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111530809918 0.0662205650399 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314273557906 0.162205337803 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580667738038 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.