Some people think that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old employees. To what extent do you agree with it? Use your experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of young employees and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of old employees are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that a young knowledgeable employee can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, skilled young employees can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of a motivated staff, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of energetic jobs. Thus, beneficial ramifications of ingenious employers are visible.
From a scientific point of view, old and experienced employees can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that demerits of a vulnerable staff are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described outdated knowledge. Hence, predicted outcomes of inefficient employers are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of young employees far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do advantages of low unemployment prove the significance of sophisticated work forces, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | Arshdeepbatth | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | faronlibenet | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Alireza.r.68 | 80 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | Ahmed145 | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | Ahmed145 | 80 | view |
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 88
- Poor lifestyles have a negative impact on people's health. List some unhealthy lifestyles and discuss what government services could help? 88
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 88
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 80
- Marketing in companies should be based on reputation or short term strategies? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76363636364 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34262170081 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663636363636 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1550130839 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.272727273 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12433438052 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380111906679 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247346785735 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667635113113 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157402400802 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.