Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world.
The Internet has attracted much social concern. Many sociologists over the world argue that the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life today. Personally, I agree with this statement.
On the one hand, personal enjoyment draws much of my attention. It is widely known that using the internet creates a chance for people to communicate with each other easily no matter where they are. Therefore, people are likely to communicate with many different people who are different from many perspectives. Thus, people are bound to learn how to communicate in harmony. As a result, it is possible for them to acquire communication skill. More interestingly, by using the internet, there is a likelihood for people to easily access to many things which help them entertain. Thus, they are certain to releases all mental burdens in their minds. Hence, it brings them many relaxing moments that help them fully concentrate on the next task. As a consequence, they will be happy. Without a doubt, using the internet has many benefits for users.
On the other hand, it is claimed that the information on the internet always causes the user to misunderstand about problems which lead to a decline in their work performance. However, it is just applicable to a minority. The information on prestige pages was carefully censored. Users also have the ability to distinguish the right information and wrong information. Furthermore, using the internet creates a chance for people to access many resources online. Therefore, it is possible for them to understand the problems in many perspectives. Hence, they deeply understand these problems. As a result, their work performance is highly likely to be improved. Beyond any doubt, the internet brings many positive effects on people.
All in all, personal enjoyment, work performance are convincing reasons for my statement. It is highly recommended that people should carefully consider my writing to make the right decision on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Kalima | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | nolo | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | nolo | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Vaibhav Panchal | 68 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | masoumsaie | 70 | view |
- Task: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way totravel without a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support youranswer 70
- Many people believe that formal "pen and paper" examinations are not the best method of asessing education achievement. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Government should provide the poor and the homeless with houses Essay topics Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world 45
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
..., people are likely to communicate with many different people who are different from many pers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 13.8261648746 7% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21671826625 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91870509655 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50773993808 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.236513971 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.2083333333 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4583333333 20.6045352989 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174617987967 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514767569825 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928913610305 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155257867687 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172276507426 0.0645574589148 267% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.