The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50 year period.
The circular charts illustrate that the changes in the numbers of five countries tourist to Australia and Germany between 1960 and 2010.
Overall, the australia was mostly preferred by the European tourist but, then Asian natives travelled more there. All region tourists were interest similar in Germany.
Initially, in Australia the European traveller were in the peak it was more than half in 1960 whereas, in 2010 this ratio declined 51% . The asian tourists percent was highest in 2010, 63% but it was least in 1960, 10% . In 1960 the british and american travellers percent was 25% and 12% respectively. The percentage of both tourist was decline 5% in 2010.
Secondly, in 1960 the U.S.A and britain natives travelled in Germany more than a fifth. Whereas, the british tourist showed declination and American were inclination it was 6% and 29% . The asian tourism were more than 15% in 2010 and in 1960 it was 10%. In 1960 and 2010 the Europe tourists were 46%and 40% respectively.
- Today children are living under more pressure from the society than the children in the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 56
- The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50 year period. 11
- The diagram shows the process of making cheese 11
- The diagram shows the process of making soft cheese. 78
- The quality of life in large cities is worsening. what could be reasons behind this.what measures can be taken to solve this problem 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...whereas, in 2010 this ratio declined 51% . The asian tourists percent was highest ...
^^
Line 9, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... 2010, 63% but it was least in 1960, 10% . In 1960 the british and american travel...
^^
Line 13, column 27, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...in 2010. Secondly, in 1960 the U.S.A and britain natives travelled in German...
^
Line 13, column 184, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rican were inclination it was 6% and 29% . The asian tourism were more than 15% in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13253012048 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59268847767 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518072289157 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0433548647 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.4545454545 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0909090909 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0452040329367 0.215688989381 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0223956961408 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433291636649 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0467627518515 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592760615133 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.