The pie charts below compare household spending in the UK in 1980 with predictions for 2030.
The pie charts illustrates the comparison of domestic spending in the United Kingdom. It depicted in the year 1980 and the foretold for the year 2030.
Overall, while population in the UK predicted to spend more money for mostly all household segments, only recreation and culture and food and drink costs will decrease.
Until the year 2030 household spending in the UK on electricity, gas and water and clothing and footwear will rise at 1 and 2%, to 8% and 7% respectively. However, costs for clothing and footwear is still remained being the least significant segment; meanwhile people will have spent more money for transport by the year 2030 will have slightly increased at 2% from 21 to 23%, continued being the second large section. Not only for these aspects of life people will pay more, but also for housing, suchlike montage, rent, growing from 22,5% in 1980 to 38% in predicted 2030 by 15,5 per cents. It made up the biggest part of the chart.
In contrast, household spending on recreation and culture and food and drink predicted to steadily decrease in the future 5 decades, by 3 and 11%, to 10 and 14 per cents, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- it is important to construct new buildings rather than maintain old one to what extand do you agree or disagree 59
- The graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children. 84
- the street plans below show a residential area with a park and playground in 2016 and the proposed changes for 2025 to make it safer for families and children 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below compare household spending in the UK in 1980 with predictions for 2030 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in the year 1980 and the foretold for the year 2030. Overall, while popu...
^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and food and drink costs will decrease. Until the year 2030 household spending i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86363636364 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63078476248 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570707070707 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5236045097 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.375 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328505222367 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143002554288 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466561437902 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198463757228 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558282634378 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.