tpo 25 the vessels could be used electric batteries
The material discusses if the vessels that were found in Iraq long time ago could be used as electric batteries. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely these vessels could not be used as batteries because the absence of wires or other conductors. In addition to that, these vessels are similar to specific cylinders, which were used to hold scrolls. Finally, ancient people did not have any purpose for using electricity.
Conversely, the lecture challenges the points, one specific contradiction is these vessels were discovered by a group of local people, so there might be other materials attached to the vessels, but since those people were not trained archaeologists, they might not recognize the importance of these materials. Next, the vessels are similar to cylinders that hold scrolls, they might be manufactured to preserve scrolls; however, latter they discovered that they could produce energy with specific liquid, so they might be originated to certain purpose then they could be adapted to another purpose. One final point, ancient people could use electricity to convince others that they had magical power; furthermore, they could use electricity for healing, such as relaxing muscles or relieve pain. Nowadays people could use electricity of the same purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-29 | Christine hanna | 81 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Christine hanna | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Christine hanna | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, regarding, so, then, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45777777778 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71843818632 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.8372443252 49.2860985944 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.444444444 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5555555556 7.06452816374 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321832647935 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14772501335 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654347359124 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21650813461 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441920723007 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.