The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of families in terms of owning and renting accommodation in England and Wales over the period of 93 years.
It is noticeable that the percentage of households in rented accommodation was higher than that of those in owned accommodation during the first half of the period, while there was an opposite trend in the last 40 years.
In 1918, the proportion families renting accommodation accounted for just over 75%, which was triple that of those in owned accommodation. After the period of stability from 1939 to 1953, this figure went down dramatically to 50% in 1971. By contrast, despite standing at just under 25% in 1918, the percentage of households in owned accommodation experienced a gradual increase with 30% in 1939 and remained constantly in the following years before reaching an equal point of those in rented accommodation in 1971.
From 1971 to 2001, the percentage of families owning accommodation continued its rising trend to reach a peak of nearly 70% before declining by 5% in 2011. The percentage of households in rented accommodation saw a different pattern with numbers going down to just above 30% in 2011, followed by a small increase of 5% in 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | Liam | 67 | view |
- IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic 8 Test 1 11
- Task 1 IELTS Writing Model - Cambridge 8 Test 4 Goods transported in UK (1974 – 2002) 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 67
- In some countries 61
- IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic 13, Test 1 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... opposite trend in the last 40 years. In 1918, the proportion families renting...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hose in rented accommodation in 1971. From 1971 to 2001, the percentage of fam...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08866995074 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04391248045 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1419148052 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.571428571 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376296100355 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174639011674 0.103423049105 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808874587813 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236421753233 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337954315555 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.