Task 1 IELTS Writing Model - Cambridge 8 Test 4 Goods transported in UK (1974 – 2002)
The graph illustrates the data of product amounts transported in the UK by four varieties of transportation systems from 1974 to 2002.
In general, road was responsible for the transportation of most goods. There was an upward trend in the quantities of goods transported by road, water and pipeline; while product transportation by rail remained a steady rate during the period.
In 1974, the amounts of goods moved by road mainly with about 70 million tonnes, while goods transportation by water and rail contributed equally with 40 million tonnes. In the contrast, pipeline played a small part in the delivery of only about 5 million tonnes.
From that year to 2002, the importance of product transportation by road went up with its figure reaching a peak at approximately 95 million tonnes. In the same way, the pipeline increased gradually over the years before peaking at 22 million tones. Although having stability in the first four years, the figures for water and rail then showed fluctuation during the period. While the former of goods transportation by water climbed to over 60 million tonnes, the latter decreased slightly before recovering to the increase trend. The amount of goods transported by rail remained constant at 40 million tonnes in spite of decrease in between the years.
- Task 1 IELTS Writing Model - Cambridge 8 Test 4 Goods transported in UK (1974 – 2002) 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 67
- IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic 13, Test 1 11
- In some countries 61
- Technology 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph illustrates the data of produc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, then, while, in general, in spite of, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19718309859 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92349947326 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525821596244 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9631037291 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174481719437 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776686825189 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691609792818 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134208680594 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604546952818 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.