Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
There is always different opinion in getting charged for visiting museum, but I say that i has got an advantage than disadvantage. I will here discuss both side.
it is good to charge for the museum vist because money generated from this can be used for the developed and creation of more facilities for the its function. By getting the additional income people will gain more services.
Looking at the another side people from the local communities will hesitate to go due to the introduction of fees and may also affect the tourist if that find that paying this much is not worth viewing.
so the few should be kept at a minimal level so that it doesn't make anyone from moving out and at the same time need to charge some fee for the development and growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'i' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...d for visiting museum, but I say that i has got an advantage than disadvantage. I w...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...e. I will here discuss both side. it is good to charge for the museum vist b...
^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...ped and creation of more facilities for the its function. By getting the additional inc...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...g this much is not worth viewing. so the few should be kept at a minimal lev...
^^
Line 13, column 57, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...d be kept at a minimal level so that it doesnt make anyone from moving out and at the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 41.998997996 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 643.0 1615.20841683 40% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 138.0 315.596192385 44% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65942028986 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42743929552 4.20363070211 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44129778758 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 176.041082164 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.695652173913 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 198.0 506.74238477 39% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9344549394 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.166666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219746025737 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997611003238 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961408158819 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127370584319 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809245605685 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 78.4519038076 32% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.