Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Being able to speak well is better than being able to write well.
In contemporary society, it’s undeniable that speaking and writing are the basic of modern linguistics. However, these days, some people argue that good in speaking is considerable than good in writing. Although it seems reasonable, I strongly disagree with such notion, and I believe that splendid writing is more useful. This essay will provide further aspects and examples to support this idea.
First and foremost, texts can be effectively spread information wider than speech. Either passage or word is quickly passed its meaning to people. This is because people can readily perceive information from their seeing than listening. I can attest this from my own experience when I traveled to Chiang Mai, the famous city in the north of Thailand, I got lost in the city because I was unfamiliar with this place. Additionally, I needed more information about the location to find my selected restaurant. Fortunately, there were many signages on the street, so I commuted to the restaurant by following the information words on the billboards. In this case, words on the signages effectively provide concise information. It is not only understandable for me or other people but people also can travel directly to the destination without losing anymore.
Secondly, people who are excellent in writing tend to be an elaborate person than those who are speaking well. This is because writing has a more complicated structure than speech. Speaking is immediate action from human’s thought, while writing has many processes to concern such as grammar, spelling and sentence structure. To illustrate this, when I studied at Chulalongkorn University, I must write a thesis book for ending my project. The thesis book required quality of writing because all of the information should be intelligible. It needed to be summarized, then be transferred to surgical written form. Therefore, writing thesis book challenged me to be more elaborate.
In conclusion, I obviously agree that professional in writing is better. This is due to the fact that people who are capable to write splendidly will be elaborate, and writing is capable to be effective information that spread wider than speaking.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Being able to speak well is better than being able to write well 85
- You are planning to study abroad. What do you think you will like and dislike about this experience? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The knowledge we gain from personal experiences is more valuable than the knowledge we gain from books Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Do not use memorized examples 87
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 498, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ook required quality of writing because all of the information should be intelligible. It ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34770114943 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00443368151 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557471264368 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6418376821 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.619047619 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5714285714 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232021604822 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681664342743 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631996621244 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151769747068 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825576245411 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.