Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
These days, humans face the depletion of natural resources. Many natural resources are equally vital for human being. If I was forced to choose one resource that needs a preservation, I personally prefer to save forests. The reason is forests are important to both humans and animals. This essay will provide further aspects and examples to support this notion in the subsequent paragraphs.
First and foremost, forests are homes of majority of animals. Without forests, animals cannot live due to the lack of food and habitats. Many species extinct and many more such as pandas and tigers are endangered. Additionally, the extinction of animals will be critical factor to harm the world’s ecosystem and adversely affects to our survival. To illustrate this, monkey, an important wild animal, is one of the animal species that relatively affected by deforestation. They use most of their life living on the trees and consuming fruits. If jungles rapidly deplete, monkeys will lose their homes and food sources. For this reason, deforestation needs to be solved for saving many wild creatures.
Secondly, another fact that supports my standpoint is that trees provide humans the renewably useful resources. Wood is the essential part that we gain from woodlands, and we use it to build a residence and many necessary human’s equipment. Moreover, wood is renewable if we have an efficient protection and invigilation. For instance, according to the research from Harvard University in Boston, wood is one of the most sustainable materials for building architecture. Because of its heat protection, a wood house is ecological and reduces over sixty percent of heat from outside the house. More importantly, natural materials such as woods avoid the emission of carbon dioxide that is the main factor of climate change from industrial manufacturing.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that forests truly require protection from destruction. This is due to the fact that forests are extremely significant for animal living and have a large amount of benefits for humanity.
- Some people prefer to live in a small town Others prefer to live in a big city Which place would you prefer to live in Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Being able to speak well is better than being able to write well 85
- You are planning to study abroad. What do you think you will like and dislike about this experience? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood Do you support or oppose this plan Why Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 97
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as for, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36474164134 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93040331801 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.123628839 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0476190476 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213780316174 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598026326204 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470108153965 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118688370857 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885324616077 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.