Some people believe that there should b fixed punishments for each type of crome. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
How punishments should be inflicted has been a question of contention almost forever. While there are some people who think that punishment should be fixed for a certain type of crime, others say that circumstances and motivation of crimes should be considered. In this essay I will discuss both these views and reach a logical conclusion.
People who say that punishment should be fixed for a type of crime often tend to derive this from the concept of equality of justice. In the light of that view, law should be blind. People who committed a certain type of crime should be punished equally, without compromising the law. And indeed this is beneficial to establish a strong and strict judicial system for any society.
Although punishment should not be discriminated, there are situations that are important to considered. We have to take into account under what circumstance a person committed a crime and what his/her motivation was. Furthermore, the age and psychological conditions of the criminals should be considered. Without considering these we cannot reach a correct and fair decision. For instance, if a someone murders another human being, it is important to know whether the person who was murdered was in any way a threat to the murderer person. If the convict was in a life threatening situation then there is a chance that his act is justified to some extent. Keeping this in mind, it is crucial to consider these things before punishing someone.
From the above argument, it is evident that the nature of the individual crime is essential in determining someone’s punishment. Otherwise the justic would not be complete.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-10 | Jatin Chaudhari | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | Jatin Chaudhari | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | Sharmin_Moyna. | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | Shahrear59 | 36 | view |
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. 56
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 61
- "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infa 23
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...strict judicial system for any society. Although punishment should not be discri...
^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'someone'?
Suggestion: a; someone
...ect and fair decision. For instance, if a someone murders another human being, it is impo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ny way a threat to the murderer person. If the convict was in a life threatening s...
^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
... determining someone's punishment. Otherwise the justic would not be complete.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, then, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08455882353 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9446831118 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547794117647 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5188660257 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4375 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348520824041 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111292559032 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108366720791 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213442391203 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106868602392 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.