Today it is common practice for many business meetings and business training to take place online. Do the advantages of this new development outweigh the disadvantages?
Virtual meetings received massive popularity among the organizations all over the world with the development of online technologies. Online training programs offer a great level of mobility, but then again, the problems arising from lack of physical presence shall be considered. In this essay, it will be discussed if the mobility of online meetings can cover-up the benefits of physical participation.
Modern softwares have offered user-friendly platform to the corporates to run online meetings and training sessions. Such programs do not require an individual’s presence to a particular place, rather he can participate from anywhere using either a laptop or smart phone. This mobility enables everyone to attend the programs in time , not being affected by the traffic. Moreover, the distance among the participants is being eradicated by digitizing the training programs. As a consequence, trainees from multiple countries can engage in skill development programs. Digital meetings not only delivered flexibility of presence, but also reduced hussle to attend.
On the other hand, online meet-ups are criticized of not having the benefits of physical presence. As member attend the programs virtually, there is no physical interaction. In other words, in a virtual meeting room, there is neither hand-shakes, nor personal opinion sharing with others. In USA, for instance, 60% people attending online training programs reported that they understand better in a real class room than an online study-place. Furthermore, as the users do not stay present in-real, they might get disconnected from the discussion because of any technical failure, missing important issues of the discussion. The consequence of no physical interaction and technical problems make digital training less apealing.
To conclude, attending meetings and training online are both appreciated and accepted by most of the organizations in this current world. Though the problem of lack of physical presence persists, the mobility that virtual meetings have to offer outweighs on the ground that people get used to it over time and technical difficulties can be avoided by keeping alternative measures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | kamal_rose96@yahoo.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | vutum | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | nainsi1991@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | marukap | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Suman1234 | 84 | view |
- In companies, promotions to high positions should be given to employees inside the company, not to someone from outside or new hiring. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Nowadays, some celebrities such as film stars, sportsmen and pop musicians are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree? Which jobs should be highly paid? 95
- Many people strive to maintain a successful career and happy family life at the same time. What problems can this situation create? What are the possible solutions? 56
- Some countries spend a lot of money to make bicycle usage easier. Why is this? Is this the best solution to traffic congestion? 84
- Some people believe that young people bring more profits to a company Others say that older people actually bring more profits Discuss both views and give your opinion 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... everyone to attend the programs in time , not being affected by the traffic. More...
^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...room, there is neither hand-shakes, nor personal opinion sharing with others. In USA, for instan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, for instance, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68693009119 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07521267005 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568389057751 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.493155642 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.058823529 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131380796641 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448429875025 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0223710972144 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883537064281 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104406241691 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.