some people argue that government should spend money on public services and facilities, but not on arts. do you agree or disagree?
The role of arts in modern life is unique, providing people with entertainment and yielding various psychological rewards, such as relief of stress. Despite these benefits, arts have been taken as luxury goods in many cases. It is suggested that public money should be concentrated in projects like public facilities, which are more likely to bring immediate benefits to the public. There are a number of facts indicating that this position is correct.
Public facilities, widely accepted as the main precursor of a city’s development, should be one of the highest priorities. Those underdeveloped cities in particular, should spend sufficient funding on public facilities. For example, municipal office, courthouses and post offices for public services, libraries, hospitals and playing fields for social and cultural activities. By boosting spending on public facilities, cities are able to satisfy the needs of the citizens and improve their standard of living.
In addition to social benefits, an integrated transport network is essential promises the smooth and speedy movement of goods and people in a city. Industrial and agricultural products of a city can be delivered to other cities in exchange to ensure steady income. It is no exaggeration to say that entrepreneurs will first examine the infrastructure of a city before deciding to start their business there.
The arts, although it provide psychological rewards, do not merit government funding. The first reason is that the arts – referring to music, film and literature altogether – are more likely to attract the investment of private sector than public facilities. Business-people will continue to invest in arts in the expectation of earning lump sum income. Meanwhile, the art is naturally pass down from generation to another . unlike public facilities, they require money to survive.
It is therefore clear that construction of public facilities should be given the foremost consideration. The concern about the well-being of individual citizens is of importance rather than arts, some thing that business have a stake in.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 23, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...iness there. The arts, although it provide psychological rewards, do not merit gov...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 423, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lly pass down from generation to another . unlike public facilities, they require ...
^^
Line 13, column 426, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unlike
... pass down from generation to another . unlike public facilities, they require money t...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 197, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...zens is of importance rather than arts, some thing that business have a stake in.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in particular, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53538461538 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08395120183 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603076923077 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8023076431 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9444444444 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254995455036 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733479284125 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682830635521 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124701805274 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058970809916 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.