The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts the fluctuations in the level of two major factors that contributes to pollution in
London, which is Smoke and Sulphur Dioxide between the year 1600 – 2000.
Overall, the main cause of pollution is Sulphur dioxide. It has emitted 950 micrograms per cubic meter
during the year 1800. Comparatively, the level of smoke emitted is less (450 micrograms per cubic
meter) between the year 1600 and 2000.
During the initial stage (1600) Sulphur dioxide was at minimal level (0 micrograms per cubic meter),
however, it has raised rapidly from 0 micrograms to 850 micrograms over the year 1600 and 1700.
During 1725, there seems to be a sudden drop in the level of Sulphur (650 micrograms) and from 1750,
there is significant rise in the level of Sulphur dioxide emitted. Pollution caused by Sulphur is at its peak
during 1800s (950). Further, there is a decline in the level of Sulphur dioxide from 1825 to 2000 (750 – 0
respectively).
Smoke contributed to the least during the beginning (1600) with 0 micrograms. There is a substantial
gain in the level of smoke emitted over the year 1625 to 1850. The upper limit of pollution caused by
smoke is during 1825 and 1895 (450 micrograms) and thereon, the emittance of smoke has fallen by 0
micrograms in 2000s.
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAN CONSTRUCTION OF NEW PUBLIC BUILDINGS SUCH AS MUSEUM,TOWN HALLS AND SPORTING FACILITIES IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN RENOVATIONS OF EXISTING ONES,WHILE OTHERS DISAGREE.DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION. 56
- Government should focus on solving immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 50
- Nowadays courses and general study online are getting very popular. However, some people still prefer attending classes in person. Discuss both views and give your own option. 11
- The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest thesefunds in public services instead.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 56
- Nowadays, television is an essential part of our lives, as a medium to spread news and awareness, and, for some, it even acts as a companion. What is your opinion about this? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: During
...mitted 950 micrograms per cubic meter during the year 1800. Comparatively, the level...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Meter
...tted is less 450 micrograms per cubic meter between the year 1600 and 2000. Durin...
^^^^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: During
...tion caused by Sulphur is at its peak during 1800s 950. Further, there is a decline ...
^^^^^^
Line 19, column 1, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1800s'.
Suggestion: during the 1800s
...tion caused by Sulphur is at its peak during 1800s 950. Further, there is a decline in the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Respectively
...hur dioxide from 1825 to 2000 750 – 0 respectively. Smoke contributed to the least durin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Gain
... 0 micrograms. There is a substantial gain in the level of smoke emitted over the ...
^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Micrograms
...he emittance of smoke has fallen by 0 micrograms in 2000s.
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 29, column 12, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2000s'.
Suggestion: in the 2000s
...e of smoke has fallen by 0 micrograms in 2000s.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89592760181 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58597186098 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443438914027 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1072363421 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3636363636 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.45454545455 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154547279909 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748348153961 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609346938201 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764509647567 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558640259126 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.