Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership
The claim asserts that leaders in power in any enterprise should step down after five years because new leadership ensures success of the enterprise. I agree with this claim to a large extent.
Most Leaders particularly in politics and government tend to be corrupt and embezzle public funds when they stay too long in power. And as such, try to remain in power at all cost to the detriment of the society / the people they govern. For example, Idi Amin who was a former military President of Uganda that ruled for 8 years. During his tenure, he was a tyrant, corrupt and lived a lavish lifestyle. Under his authority, the Ugandan economy declined and became a poor country.
New leadership brings in opportunity for innovations and new ideas. No wonder most democratic countries allows a President to rule for 4 years and can only be re-elected to power for not more than another 4 years. Countries like the United States have used this periodic change of power to usher in new ideas in a changing world.
However, most business owners lead their companies for over five years and consistently improved their businesses. Bill Gates of Microsoft and Steve Jobs of Apple. These leaders have consistently improved their businesses for over five years with innovations. Such Business owners are passionate about their business development and the decision to step down is theirs. In most businesses, the leadership change of power is usually based on several others factors, not necessary a routine change of power.
In summary, leaders , especially in politics and government should step down after five years because the surest path to success for these enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. However, this claim does not necessarily hold true for leaders in business especially business owners.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- Milk and dairy products are rich in vitamin D and calcium—substances essential for building and maintaining bones. Many people therefore say that a diet rich in dairy products can help prevent osteoporosis, a disease that is linked to both environmental 50
- "Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of tra 63
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ange of power. In summary, leaders , especially in politics and government s...
^^
Line 17, column 134, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this enterprise' or 'these enterprises'?
Suggestion: this enterprise; these enterprises
... because the surest path to success for these enterprise is revitalization through new leadershi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in business especially business owners.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for example, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 296.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18243243243 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72696588859 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560810810811 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2088466617 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2352941176 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35294117647 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329490282619 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974284648424 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125489377425 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202064926142 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120084532197 0.0667264976115 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.