Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspects or it has adverse effects? Do you agree or disagree? Give examples from your experience.

Essay topics:

Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspects or it has adverse effects? Do you agree or disagree? Give examples from your experience.

Recently, the phenomenon of learning a new language at early age and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is gighly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a sunstantial numbers of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the positive future of childrens can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a general standpoint, the learning foreign language in school can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiments which discovered current policies. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both improving personal skills and developing social capability apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of a public arena, learning online might increase the consequences of education facilitis. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with sustainable development . Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of equitable education.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benfits of growing chance of english learning far outweigh its drawbaks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-31 arami 88 view
2018-03-06 meenutalwar 88 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user arami :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... negatively with sustainable development . Hence, it is correct to presume the pre...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71485943775 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24371145449 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686746987952 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.004319848 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.363636364 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140990431525 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438164790042 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490599665172 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707089622897 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533211268359 0.0609392437508 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.26 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.