Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Society and nation is fully responsible for the preservation and protection of the species which are going to be extinct in the nature. It is because human beings are the most conscious living being in the planet and their role plays a vital role in the sustainability and occurrence of the other all species in the world; as human beings are manupulating al-most all species in the planet for their benefits. So, Society should make every possible effort to save these endangered species.
Human beings are increasing day by day. With the increment of human population, their desires augments in a very rapid pace and their activities directly and indirectly harming the existing population of species due to which some of them are listed as endangered. The over-exploitation of human beings and lack of proper care and maintenance has a great impact on the potential extinction of these species. So it is so exigent to give top priority to make efforts to save those going-to-be extinct species. These special efforts can help to revive them from the jeopardy. It helps to maintain the ecological balance for the better performance of the nature and these species will be ensured for future. If they are prevented from being extinct, and special efforts are done to increase their number through effective breeding and other maintenance options, then number will escalate and future generation will have opportunity to enjoy their existence. For example; endangered species like Bengal Tigers, which have been in the serious condition today due to human activities like poaching and illegal hunting, if not given stress today, they will be extinct in just few coming generations. So priority should be done to those endangered species which are in danger today due to our own activities because if we do not check on it recently, we cannot be do anything in future, only just repenting on our remiss.
However, there is not only sole cause for major extinction of endangered species. Besides human beings, natural calamities like flood, landslides, volcano, earthquake, climate change and change in species' behavior and habitats can also be other factors which are also affecting the number of those species adversely. These activities are not always in the hand of human beings, they can be natural too. So, it is very important to identify the major causes of the extinction of those species before taking any actions. For example; if a group of species is decreasing in number due to change in their behavior, then at that case, recommendations related to decrease the impacts of human beings cannot do enough good. Proper scientific research should be done in order to find the major cause of extinction and government should impart possible rules and regulations to stop or prevent negative impacts of possible factors. If these activities are done in a right way, then proper solution for the extinction of species will be achieved. For example; decreasing the human impact and in the same time, increasing their number through effective breeding and scientific techniques can be best solution for most of the endangered species.
In these ways, it is concluded that society should make efforts for all types of extinction; natural or human-influenced. It's not always the extinction is due to human activities. It might be influenced by other several factors which also should be stressed in these programmes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs. 66
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 58
- In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn asmuch by watching television as they can by reading books 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1367, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...n it recently, we cannot be do anything in future, only just repenting on our remiss. H...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 954, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e factors. If these activities are done in a right way, then proper solution for the extinctio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1184, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the best'.
Suggestion: be the best
... breeding and scientific techniques can be best solution for most of the endangered spe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...xtinction; natural or human-influenced. Its not always the extinction is due to hum...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2867.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 560.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11964285714 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.8645985582 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78888041229 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 908.1 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.781234527 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.652173913 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.347826087 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.13043478261 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249166017987 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942177253925 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473489636075 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187762428012 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193411976743 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.