Television advertising directed toward young children(aged two to five) should not be allowed.
No one can deny that with the development of digital technologies, TV is something that is found almost in every home. In fact, is considered a helpful tool because it may help keeping people updated about the news and it may be entertaining because of the broadcast shows and we can find about several things from the advertising. I believe there is a bad thing watching the TV at home especially when you have young kids. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explain in the next paragraphs.
First of all, kids are very receptive and very sensitive at what they hear and see. I consider that is important for the kids to hear information directly from their parents and not from other sources because they know better how certain things can affect them in a good or bad form. Also, taking into account that from my experience the information that we receive through the advertising is not really filtered, if we talk about small kids is indicated to give them the information that is suitable for their age to prepare them to find out about certain things later, when is the right time. For this reasons, I consider that advertising is not a good to be addressed to young kids.
Secondly, if accidentally they see an advertise related to a bad news they may be affected by it and can develop an emotion about it, such as fear. Drawing from my experience, a few years ago when my brother was little he saw a commercial about a game and he was influenced by it and want it badly even if it wasn’t suitable for him. In fact, I remember that is was quite difficult for my parents to handle his desire and explain him why he don’t need it and why is not good for him.
In conclusion, I truly believe that advertising directed to kids is not good and may be limited or even excluded because it can affect them since they are not ready to filter and understand the information by their own and because it may influence them in a bad way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Andres01 | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | rezamousavi666 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | jiyakavya | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ings later, when is the right time. For this reasons, I consider that advertising is...
^^^^
Line 9, column 36, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... Secondly, if accidentally they see an advertise related to a bad news they may be affec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 365, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...table for him. In fact, I remember that is was quite difficult for my parents to h...
^^
Line 9, column 368, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...le for him. In fact, I remember that is was quite difficult for my parents to handl...
^^^
Line 13, column 254, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r own and because it may influence them in a bad way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49582172702 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58662658676 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493036211699 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.6205415537 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9166666667 20.6045352989 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940576516843 0.236089414692 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408637654052 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044135627448 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615884931562 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224991213014 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.1575268817 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.