Rich countries are helping poor countries through money, but they should also help them in another way. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is known fact that developed countries provide financial help to poor countries will not solve the poverty issue and therefore other effective methods needed to be addressed to improve the quality of life of people. I completely agree with this statement and this essay aims at discussing the supporting details to my point of view in further paragraphs.
There are various other methods available to help developing nations to improve the living standard of their people. First of all, in poor countries like Bangladesh, Nepal, citizens do not have access to health facilities. Many people die every year because of inadequate health facilities. To cite an instance, a survey was conducted by WHO and it was found that in these nations millions of people died every year because of tuberculosis, respiratory illnesses etc although these diseases are preventable and curable by early diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, rich nations can help these countries by building hospitals and providing efficient health services to these nations.
Secondly, the other most important way to help poor nations by empowering their education system. In most of these countries many people are illiterate and literacy rate is much lower as compared to the developed nations. This is the main contributing factor that people are living below poverty line. So, rich countries could help these countries by improving their education system through investing in infrastructure and sending their well trained teachers. This approach will definitely help to improve the literacy rate of poor countries.
In conclusion, having considered all the points elaborated above it can be stated that there are number of methods available other than the financial aid to poor countries to eradicate their poverty and improve quality of life.
- People in the current generation are not fit and active and it will cause health problems in future. What could be the reasons and suggest solutions for this issue. 67
- While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities.,rather than qualification and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree. Give your opinion and include relevant example. 78
- Some people think that instead of preventing the climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Rich countries are helping poor countries through money but they should also help them in another way To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...various other methods available to help developing nations to improve the living standard ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ervices to these nations. Secondly, the other most important way to help poo...
^^
Line 9, column 186, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...iterate and literacy rate is much lower as compared to the developed nations. This...
^^
Line 13, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of poor countries. In conclusion, having considered all the points elabora...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 32.9175257732 73% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 937.175257732 165% => OK
No of words: 285.0 206.0 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42105263158 4.54256449028 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77172106698 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 127.690721649 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 290.88556701 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.9531957568 44.8134815571 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.846153846 76.5299724578 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 16.8248392259 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 4.34317383033 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226841494288 0.216113520407 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856140583763 0.0766984524023 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066725808895 0.0603063233224 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136607759081 0.12726935374 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532051704437 0.0580467560999 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 8.37731958763 180% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 70.7449484536 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 7.45979381443 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 8.71597938144 162% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 41.2886597938 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.