The pie charts compares the quantity of water people use for three different purposes in San Diego County, California and the rest of the world.
Overall, the major aim of water usage in San Diego County and California is residential meanwhile the figure for this field in worldwide is the smallest.
Water usage for residential holds the largest share in San Diego County at 60%, which is 21% higher than the runner up, California. By contrast, the proportion of worldwide is a minority of 8% in this field. The opposite trend can be seen when we look at water consumption for agriculture. This holds the lion’s share of global water use while the figure for the San Diego County and California is 17% and 28% respectively.
Such dramatic differences are not seen when we compare the figures for industrial water use. The proportion of water in San Diego County and worldwide share a similar pattern where this accounts 10% higher, at 33%.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 56
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 73
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 87
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87037037037 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67107117965 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524691358025 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2021164986 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.625 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373176859254 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172600875737 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144588072907 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273928311956 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133722245353 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.