The bar chart compares how often American people consumed in fast food restaurants over a period of ten years starting from 2003.
Overall, the frequencies for “ Once a week” and “ Once or twice a month” gained in popularity to American people. A reverse pattern was seen towards the percentage for “ eating outside everyday” and “ never did so” in between 2003 and 2013.
In 2003, 17% people went to fast food restaurant several times a week, which was a half lower than the figure for its counterparts who did so once a week and once or twice a month, representing at 32% and 30% respectively. Three years later, there was a slight increase by 3% in the porportion of eaters several times a week and once a week reached a peak of 33% , but witnessed a drop of 8% in once or twice a month. In 2013, the percentage of American who had a meal once or twice a month stood at the highest, 33% meanwhile the figures for once a week and several times a week reduced nearly 5 %.
In 20103, the proportion of eaters who had a meal out of home a few times a year gained 13% and hit the plateau in the rest period. With regard to two frequencies, the percentage of “ Everyday” and “ Never” were all less than 5% during the whole ten years.
- An increase in production of consumer goods result in damage of the natural environment . What are the reasons and possible solutions. 84
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 62
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 87
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtion of eaters several times a week and once a week reached a peak of 33% , but ...
^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...k and once a week reached a peak of 33% , but witnessed a drop of 8% in once or ...
^^
Line 4, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a peak of 33% , but witnessed a drop of 8% in once or twice a month. In 2013, th...
^^
Line 6, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... percentage of ' Everyday' and ' Never' were all less than 5%...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55555555556 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72510011571 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542735042735 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.6570723581 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.25 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.25 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122835031807 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06803690716 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993228060074 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105139349247 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115988221415 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.76 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.