Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In my opinion, I disagree that learning to have functioning relationships with others is more crucial to be successful at any position than studying hard in school. I feel this way for many reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, establishing healthy connections with people is always a win-win situation. through these bridges, individuals could know about each others' needs and offer their help or knowledge to their peers. For instance, a new hire could get help from older employees on their first day on the job. On the other hand, newcomers could give a hand to other workers so that the assigned tasks would be finished on time. Furthermore, a person who knows how to relate to colleagues would benefit by being more informed than an isolated person. As a result, they would have immediate knowledge about available opportunities and can devote their time and energy to the things that would help them advance their career.
Another noteworthy point that ought to be mentioned here is that succeeding in school is also critical for a successful career. Companies not only looks at social skills but also qualifications and degrees. Besides emphasizing their communication skills during an interview, candidates should demonstrate wide knowledge of their field as well, which only comes through doing well during the academic years. What's more, To be considered for promotions, employees must attain a required level of education, most of the time it goes beyond just a bachelor degree to more advanced postgraduate credentials.
To sum up, I oppose the idea that social abilities are more significant than studying hard in school. I believe that For a person to be accomplished in a job, s/he has to achieve satisfying levels in both their social and academic capabilities.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | DHANDA | 90 | view |
2020-01-13 | naziii | 76 | view |
2020-01-06 | sarah halawani | 65 | view |
2020-01-06 | liviapabreu | 66 | view |
2020-01-05 | Somayya | 76 | view |
- A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a “burning mirror”: a polished copper surface curved to focus 85
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates, has grown into a 80
- many people believe that greed, or the desire to have more wealth than other people have, is a bad characteristic; people who are greedy are often considered selfish or unkind. However, some people argue that greed is actually a good characteristic for a 90
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 90
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed damaged by human activity Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live What is your opinion Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Through
...h people is always a win-win situation. through these bridges, individuals could know a...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 408, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...h doing well during the academic years. Whats more, To be considered for promotions, ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their social and academic capabilities.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, well, as to, for instance, i feel, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 297.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15824915825 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86727965359 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626262626263 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4169237454 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.428571429 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 5.45110844103 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192582163592 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664575582362 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636166273738 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134433681898 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548131205437 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.