TPO 47 Integrated writing
The article and the lecture are both about effectiveness of cloud seeding in reducing hail. The author says that the hail pellets can harm crops in the feilds, and the possible way to decline it is cloud seeding which is almost confirmed by some evidences. The lecturer opposes this claim by mentioning some reasons.
First of all, experiments in laboratory show that when experimenters added silver iodode to the cold water which is made by hail, they observed light snow forming except hail pellets most of the time.The lecturer claims that it is maybe true. she also adds that creating snow would be harmful, though by preventing precipitations, such as rain and the others. she implies risk of droughts and lack of water by saying that.
Second, the article points out evidence in Asia which showed the cloud seeding's effectiveness. The writer states that it can control precipitation in urban areas, and that's why there is a claim stating that it can protect farms in the united state. The lecturer ignores this statement. she thinks that urban pollution could affect to the results, and that's why it maybe not work on unpolluted areas.
Finally, the article mentions a local study in central united state which showed that feilds used cloud seeding had less harmless than areas not used cloud seeding. it is stated in the lecture that it could be because of natural variation in cold weather.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... is almost confirmed by some evidences. The lecturer opposes this claim by mentioni...
^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ng except hail pellets most of the time.The lecturer claims that it is maybe true. ...
^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... lecturer claims that it is maybe true. she also adds that creating snow would be h...
^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...pitations, such as rain and the others. she implies risk of droughts and lack of wa...
^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...ntrol precipitation in urban areas, and thats why there is a claim stating that it ca...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...e. The lecturer ignores this statement. she thinks that urban pollution could affec...
^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...lution could affect to the results, and thats why it maybe not work on unpolluted are...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...less than areas not used cloud seeding. it is stated in the lecture that it could ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, may, second, so, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92827004219 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49653572577 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590717299578 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9292474209 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0438810173178 0.272083759551 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0162435110451 0.0996497079465 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0148311390839 0.0662205650399 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0268279988824 0.162205337803 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130208880175 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.