In order to solve traffic problems, government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
One of many ways to solve traffic problem is government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. However, there are advantages and disadvantages of such solution.
This measure will bring advantages to, at least, these three aspects – the environment, the improvement of facility, and the society. If the government levy the tax for private car, people will think twice before buying a car. Thus, the number of car wandering on the road will be a lot lower. This will give positive effects to our environment – the air will not be as polluted as that of before and the traffic jam will not occur so frequently as that of before.
The policy will also help to improve our public transportation system. Higher and higher quantity of people using public transportation, because of the rocketing tax of private car, will force the authorized institution to design a better form of transportation system.
Furthermore, the number of traffic accident happening at rush hours will become less and less because people prefer to use bus, train, or any other means of public transportations which are saver than the four-wheeled private motor vehicle.
Beside the advantages, this solution will also bring some disadvantages. Car vendors will not get profit as much as that of before and it may lead to serious economical problem – mass unemployment because the automotive corporations can not pay their labor’s wage – in some industrious contries. In addition, national income from purchase tax will be smaller because not so many people possess private car.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-09 | astu | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | Nguyen051207 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | macanh0811 | view | |
| 2022-12-13 | Ahmad Ilham Zamzami | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | ieltsmaster | 73 | view |
- In order to solve traffic problems government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution 43
- The line graph illustrates the regular use of a car in a household of The Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 shown in percentages. 85
- Main Reason for Migration to from The UK in 2007 81
- Fish and Meat Consumption 80
- Logging of the rain forests is a serious problem and it may lead to the extinction of animal life and human life Discuss 36
One of many ways to solve traffic problem is government should tax private car owners heavily
One of many ways to solve traffic problem is whether or not government should tax private car owners heavily
If the government levy the tax for private car,
If the governments levy the tax for private car,
Sentence: Furthermore, the number of traffic accident happening at rush hours will become less and less because people prefer to use bus, train, or any other means of public transportations which are saver than the four-wheeled private motor vehicle.
Error: transportations Suggestion: transportation
Sentence: Car vendors will not get profit as much as that of before and it may lead to serious economical problem ? mass unemployment because the automotive corporations can not pay their labor's wage ? in some industrious contries.
Error: contries Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Words: 259 350
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 259 350
No. of Characters: 1302 1500
No. of Different Words: 144 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.012 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.027 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.851 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 96 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 67 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.583 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.836 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.833 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.356 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.639 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.051 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5