In order to solve traffic problems, the government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
Nowadays, with the rising population, more families have their own cars to travel conveniently. Thus, it leads to traffic problems everywhere, anywhere, government suggest that we should tax private car owners heavily and use that money to upgrade the public transportation. Accordingly, I partially agree with this current way of dealing with traffic issues can be effective.
Firstly, if the government puts it into practice, more car owners will promote the use of public transport systems. It will ensure that the traffic congestion in rush hours, thus making the roads more manageable. Moreover, this innovation benefits and contributes to saving the environment by reducing pollution and excessive use of natural resources like petrol and gas. Second, it will also ease the pressures on the roads, hence, making maintainance, new constructions will be easier and more efficient.
On the other hand, this suggestion is also seen as a form of discrimination. If authorities pass that law, it seems unfair because not only do private cars cause traffic jams, but also motorbikes, coaches, and other types of vehicles. Furthermore, automobiles account for a large amount of economy. Consequently, there will be a drop in car sales which can affect the livelihoods of many businesses, employers and the economy.
In conclusion, weighing up both sides I would say that although tax heavily on private car owners which can have certain negative impacts on individuals and the publics for handling with but the benefits that it brings to the communities are impossible to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-09 | astu | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | Nguyen051207 | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | macanh0811 | view | |
| 2022-12-13 | Ahmad Ilham Zamzami | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | ieltsmaster | 73 | view |
- In order to solve traffic problems the government should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution 61
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In many countries around the world life expectancy is increasing Discuss the advantages disadvantages of this situation and give your own opinion 56
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in an effort to deal with the health issues involved Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education in the school 73
- Global warming is one of the biggest threats to our environment What causes global warming What solutions are there for this problem 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...the public transportation. Accordingly, I partially agree with this current way o...
^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions will be easier and more efficient. On the other hand, this suggestion is al...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... businesses, employers and the economy. In conclusion, weighing up both sides I ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... In conclusion, weighing up both sides I would say that although tax heavily on ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, second, so, thus, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.348 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00965114257 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9472889893 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.416666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250575227291 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841051174524 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117825447044 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145349112657 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749181402725 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.