In the modern era, there has been a remarkable increase in the number of people who have sedantary life-style. This essay will delve both reasons and solutions of this situation before drawing a reasonable conclusion. In my opinion, there are a veriety of possible reasons, such as technology and even the Internet for this, however, steps can definitely be taken to tackle this problem.
Admittedly, after decades of speculation, doctors and sociologists now have fairly accurate information concerning why people became more inactive. Perhaps the main reason of this is that people can easily access everything without any effort thanks to the Internet. A good illustration of this is that in the past decades, people should have go to shopping malls in order to purchase their needs, however, nowadays they can easily buy everything through the Internet. The result of this is that people people became inactive, which in turn leads to serious illnesses. Thus, becoming more inactive might be perilous for not only physical health but also mental health.
Despite these arguments, there are a variety of possible solutions in order to cope with sedantary life-style. The primary solution of this is that either the government or employers ought to encourage their employees to do regular exercise. According to a report published by the New York Times, Apple Company organized competitions in order to increase employees’ physical activity rates. Furthermore, other solutions, such as exercise in work place should not be underestimated by employees because their crativity and productivity might increase through this exercise routine. Hence, both the government and employers should be prudent concerning to tackle inactivity problem.
In conclusion, even though a number of measures have been taken to tackle sedantary life-style, the problem could not be solved yet. It must be said that the decision as to whether which solution is more appropriate to solve inactivity problem must be taken in the context of the entire society. However, my personal view is that technological progress and the shortage of time can cause inactive life-style, and competitions might be useful to solve this situation.
- Grandparents play a big role in bringing up the children. Do you think it is useful for grandparents? Discuss reasons with your opinion and give relevant examples. 73
- Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged to be used by some countries.To what extent is this a positive or negative developme 84
- Some people say modern children s games do not develop a wide range of skills while traditional games can be much better for developing such skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- some people think that competitive sports should be included as a subject inschool while others believe that it has negative effect on children.Discuss both the view and give your opinion. 61
- Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal. some people, however, think that other types of progress and equally important for a country. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...in the past decades, people should have go to shopping malls in order to purchase ...
^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: people
...he Internet. The result of this is that people people became inactive, which in turn leads to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... yet. It must be said that the decision as to whether which solution is more appropriate to s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, thus, as to, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40922190202 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90819366265 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544668587896 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6723793899 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.3125 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284000235254 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913229137158 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643861044734 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177976729058 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719062341262 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.