The more one gets committed to an idea or a policy the more he will know about its flipsides if any. So the recommendation that people who are the most deeply committed to an idea are the most critical of it, is true but not in all scenarios. I would like to elaborate on this more with the help of few examples.
In the field of medicine, many drugs have their own advantages and disadvantages. A doctor who is dedicated to his profession possesses the knowledge of both the benefits and side effects. Hence when a patient comes with an ailment, he prescribes the drugs for a specific amount of time. If there is any side effect he also mentions the same to the patient and suggest to unfollow the prescription once the desired state is attained.
Second example: nuclear energy is seemed as one of the most powerful sources of energy. It has both positive as well as negative impacts. Scientists who are aware of both of these, monitor the functioning of the nuclear plants for energy generation. They also keep a check at the nuclear waste generated in these plans which can be hazardous if gets accessible to the masses. Hence they take care of their disposal safely.
Although it is true that a dedicated person will also be critical but this notion applies to fields which has both benefits and disadvantages. The fields like humanitarian work and social services, which are only beneficial for the public do not seek critical thinking. Examples are Mother Teresa and Mahatma Gandhi. Both of them were considered epitome in their own fields. While Mother dedicated her life completely for the service of destitute people, Gandhi devoted his life to nonviolence. Both of them did not have any critical thinking in their domain.
Clubbing up all the points I can conclude that it is true that deeply committed people can also be critical but this notion applies only to the fields which have both positive as well as negatives.
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 57
- “Over the past year, our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of local 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 70
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts— especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the state 80
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 55
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 337 350
No. of Characters: 1565 1500
No. of Different Words: 172 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.285 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.644 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.536 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 108 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 75 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.737 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.232 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.579 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.287 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.527 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.088 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5