The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries
A glance at the provided table reveals the percentage of consumer spending on various items in Europe countries, including Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey in 2002.
On balance, most spending belonged to food, drinks, and tobacco; by contrast, the expenditure on leisure and education was smallest in out of five categories. Furthermore, the figure for all items in Turkey is higher than that in others except in apparel.
The rate of spending food, drinks, and tobacco in Turkey ranked first, at nearly one third, following by that in Ireland, at roughly 29%. Additionally, the figure for leisure and education in Turkey was twice as higher as the one for Ireland in comparison between 4.35% and 2.21%. Nevertheless, regarding clothing and footwear, both Ireland and Turkey shared a comparable figure with over 6 percent.
The percentage of Swedish expenditure on food, drinks, and tobacco was the smallest one; however, in terms of education, its figure overtook that in Spain, which was the smallest one, at 1.98%. In terms of apparel, the rate of consumers in Italy was the highest, at accurately 9 percent, whereas the smallest one belonged to Sweden. Besides, all of the rates in Italy were higher than those in Spain except for food, drink, and tobacco.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-01-04 | hananguyen | 78 | view |
2022-11-26 | ThaoVannn07 | 78 | view |
2021-11-02 | Louisa_Nguyễn | 64 | view |
2020-07-14 | faisal vhora | 73 | view |
2020-05-28 | charlotte1412 | 73 | view |
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 95
- The table below give information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 73
- Writing task 1 the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Please briefly state your scientific and professional interests and objectives, as well as your career goals. Include a description of your past accomplishments that are not evident from the examination of other documents submitted. Report your results, i 11
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...allest one belonged to Sweden. Besides, all of the rates in Italy were higher than those i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, nevertheless, regarding, so, third, whereas, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 26.3917525773 163% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 937.175257732 114% => OK
No of words: 209.0 206.0 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11961722488 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68630354479 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516746411483 0.622605031667 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 290.88556701 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.463917525773 1078% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 1.44329896907 624% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.8655423069 44.8134815571 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.888888889 76.5299724578 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 16.8248392259 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 4.34317383033 238% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0166250669234 0.216113520407 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00859032679075 0.0766984524023 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0161091849038 0.0603063233224 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0133751265783 0.12726935374 11% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149849599138 0.0580467560999 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 8.37731958763 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 70.7449484536 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 7.45979381443 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 8.71597938144 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 41.2886597938 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.